Noteworthy Lenses – Canon FD 28mm ƒ/2.8

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 1

For a lens to be remarkable it doesn’t always have to be exceptionally gorgeous, have the highest specification, or cost as much as a small, used car. Sometimes the best lenses are modestly specced and modestly priced. These lenses quietly go about their business, never being lauded with high praise or photographed for Instagram camera-porn.

Canon’s 28mm ƒ/2.8 FDn is just such a lens, and we’ve spent the past week putting this quiet contender through its paces. Shot on a classic film body and on today’s mirror-less machines, we’ve found this little FDn to be an excellent wide-angle offering with just a few minor drawbacks. While these issues may be deal-breakers for some, for many others this just might be the perfect wide-angle lens.

For full specs, pricing, and notes on practical use, read on. Hey, we may just give this thing a chance to pose for a center-fold!

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 4

Whether using an old Canon body such as the A-1 or AE-1, or a new mirror-less camera with suitable adapter, shooting the 28mm ƒ/2.8 is the same as any other Canon FD or FDn lens.

On film cameras with Auto Exposure modes, set the lens’ aperture ring to “A” and the camera will handle stopping the aperture down at the moment of shutter release to create a perfectly exposed shot. If you want control over depth-of-field, rotate the aperture ring to any ƒ-stop and the automatic aperture lever will preselect your desired aperture, enabling wide-open through-the-lens metering.

These days Canon FD and FDns are easily adapted for use on the modern crop of mirror-less machines such as Fujifilm’s X series and Sony’s exceptional a7. Simply buy an adapter from Amazon or eBay, attach your lens and camera, and enjoy this fantastic legacy glass coupled with today’s modern conveniences. Buy a glass-less adapter that enables infinity focus for the purest results and you’ll be good to go. Shooting this way requires manual aperture adjustments, but that’s a small trade for the abilities gained through the use of these masterful, new machines.

The 28mm ƒ/2.8 is aesthetically unremarkable. It looks fine, but it’s not going to impress you with fancy paintwork or shiny metal. Entirely black with a plastic aperture and focus ring, there’s nothing to shout about. The green and white lettering is visible enough in most situations and the red alignment dot is of the 3-D variety (rather than painted on), something we personally enjoy for aiding in rapid, eyes-free mounting.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 7

If there’s anything noteworthy about the way this lens looks it’s that it looks just like every other FDn. While this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, it does create one drawback, and that is that it can be difficult to pick the lens out of a bag full of lenses. If you’re carrying a 50mm, 28mm, and a 35mm FDn in a camera bag, good luck differentiating between the three when it comes time to swap lenses. Is this a big problem? Not really. Just something that occasionally happens to those of us with less-than-stellar eyesight, or those who spend their time shooting in the dark.

Non-optically related build quality is fine, typical to the established ethos of this lens. It works without providing much in the way of superlatives or liabilities. It’s made with Canon’s relatively strong polycarbonate (plastic), a very durable material that we’ve never broken in a drop. It can happen, of course, but to be honest metal lenses tend to dent and bend in more destructive ways than do Canon’s plastic shells. If you drop this lens it’s likely that it will still be perfect, aside from a few scratches.

The copious use of plastic offers other benefits as well. It’s helped to create one of the FDn range’s lightest lenses. At 170g, this lens is the second lightest FDn you’ll find. It’s also exceptionally compact, being only 40mm long and 63mm in diameter.

If we’re really looking for a downside to the use of plastic it’s to be found in the filter threads. While dropping this lens from a standing height will almost never result in catastrophic damage, it’s landing on the filter ring will likely leave you with a lens that’s no longer able to accept filters. Again, slim chance, but this is the weak link in the 28’s construction.

Optical build quality is exceptional, and one half of the reason this lens is noteworthy (the other half being its price relative to this optical quality). Using seven elements in seven groups (that’s right, every element is floating alone), Canon created one of the most optically pure wide-angle lenses you’ll find. Distortion is virtually nonexistent due in large part to the arrangement of these elements. Spherical aberration is almost entirely corrected, resulting in images that are highly-detailed and perfectly resolved.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 3

That said, distortion does present itself when shooting subjects at extremely close proximity. Common in all wide-angle lenses, get a subject within a foot of the lens and you’re likely to see exaggerated forms, warped perspectives, and long faces diminishing rapidly into the distance. Canon’s lens manual states that you can use these characteristics intentionally to “distort the subject… for a dynamic, three-dimensional effect.” This is true; just remember that wide-angle lenses draw the subject closer and push away the background. Shoot accordingly.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 5

Many people will say that these lenses are great for landscapes. That’s right, but it’s important to include a subject in the foreground of said landscape. If you shoot a 28mm lens at a line of trees 300 yards away, expect to make a boring photo. Without a bit of foreground filler, every shot from a wide-angle lens will look like a barren wasteland. Used indoors or for street photography the 28mm shines, making small spaces look large and dynamic, and giving your street photography an “up-close-and-personal” feeling.

The lens uses Canon’s Super Spectra Coating (S.S.C.) from the previous generation of higher spec FD lenses. This isn’t as magical as it sounds, but rather is Canon’s term for lenses featuring multi-coating as opposed to the single-coated Spectra Coating (S.C.) of their previous lower end lenses. It should also be noted for clarity that all FDn lenses (aside from the 50mm ƒ/1.8) benefit from implementation of the higher-end S.S.C.

What’s all this nonsense mean? Essentially that you won’t find a better FD lens for controlling optical aberrations like color-fringing, ghosts, and flares. That said, this lens doesn’t do a very good job of controlling ghosts and flares.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 8

Shooting into sunlight will almost always result in unwanted anomalies. In some cases this is a seriously pronounced issue, even with the lens stopped down substantially. It’s been reported that using a lens hood will help mitigate this issue, but in our testing we’ve found shielding the sun from direct contact with the front element does little to reduce ghosting. Unfortunately, we’ve stumbled upon this lens’ biggest weakness. It will be up to each individual user to decide if it’s a deal breaker. But aside from this, the S.S.C. does an excellent job of mitigating chromatic aberration, a galling anomaly that we feel instantly ruins many photos.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 10

Canon’s multi-coating also helps to create incredible contrast and sharpness. The images made with this lens, even shot wide open, are among the sharpest, most finely-detailed shots you’ll ever see from a lens in any price-point. The sharpness at ƒ/2.8 is pretty amazing, even better than some other lenses shot stopped down a bit. To further sharpen things, stop this lens down to ƒ/4 or ƒ/8 and detail becomes truly among the best in the business. Sharpness extends from the center of the frame right to the edges at almost every ƒ-stop, and even at its widest things are very crisp with only minimal softness at the very edges of the frame.

Wide open there’s a bit of light-falloff (vignetting) that resolves itself fairly quickly around ƒ/4, but this is common in wide-angle lenses, is easily solved in post-processing, and can be used for artistic impact if desired. For these reasons, we don’t see it being much of a problem in the grand scheme of things.

Canon FD 28mm 2.8 review 9

It’s true that the bokeh-obsessed won’t be blown away by this lens; it’s a wide-angle lens after all. But to be fair it does make “okay bokeh”. While naturally not as well-blended as bokeh from faster lenses of a longer focal length, it is among the best we’ve seen in a 28mm at this price-point.

The very close minimum focusing distance of 0.3 meters (1.0 feet) helps coax some nice blur, drawing attention to the sharp foreground subject while casting the background in as fuzzy an aspect as possible. Bokeh highlights present as slightly polygonal, due to the relatively few number of aperture blades (five). So while this lens can make decent blur, you’ll only see completely circular bokeh-balls when shooting wide open.

Videographers will be happy with this lens’ giant field-of-view, incredible sharpness, its close focusing distance, and its rapid focus throw. Rotation on the focus ring can dial things in quickly and fluidly. Depth-of-field is excellent, yet subject isolation is still possible when shooting detailed close-ups. Just watch out for those flares and ghosts on sunny days.

When looking to buy, keep in mind the general principal of information asymmetry. Buyers who don’t or won’t disclose the status of a lens aren’t worth your time. If the listing is sparsely informed, ask questions of the buyer. Watch for lens fungus, oily aperture blades, excessive dust or damage, and move on if any of these issues are present. The 28mm FDn was one of Canon’s best-sellers. As such, there’s a surfeit of inventory such that you can easily source one elsewhere. As always, our own F-Stop Cameras is a great place to start your search.

il_fullxfull.650151102_m0l2 (1)

There’s also an earlier version of the 28mm ƒ/2.8 FDn, easily distinguishable via its breach-lock mounting device. If the lens has a silver ring around the base, you’re looking at an earlier FD. There’s nothing wrong with these lenses, construction and build quality are indistinguishable from the FDn, but they will only offer Spectra Coating which we’ve already touched upon. Given that market prices for both the FD and FDn are virtually identical, it makes sense to go for the FDn and its higher grade coatings, unless you’ve some kind of special preference for the original.

In either case, those looking for a well-rounded wide-angle lens need look no further than the 28mm ƒ/2.8 FD/FDn. It’s affordable, capable, quietly confident; what more do you need? Sure, it’s not the fastest lens, but it doesn’t claim to be either. Use this lens within its limitations and if your photos aren’t very good you’ll have no one to blame but yourself. If you want an amazing, no-nonsense, wide-angle lens for less money than many people spend on a week’s worth of coffee, here it is.

Buy it from our own F-Stop Cameras

Buy it on eBay

Buy it on Amazon

CASUAL PHOTOPHILE is on Ello, FacebookInstagram, and Youtube

You Might Also Like


  • Reply
    Rob Moses Photography
    November 2, 2015 at 5:09 am

    Looks good. I might have to pick one up.

  • Reply
    March 16, 2016 at 1:49 pm

    Thanks a lot. This definitely helped me out. I got one of those and I am totally happy with it.

    • Reply
      March 16, 2016 at 1:52 pm

      That’s excellent. I hope you enjoy it for a long time!

  • Reply
    Randle P. McMurphy
    March 30, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    Prefer one lens or focal length over another has always been a journey.
    Starting photography I hated the 35mm, didn´t get satisfied with the 28mm
    and ended with a 24mm which I kept in my bag in all camera systems till today.

    But !

    Never say never again so I run into a Canon FD 2,8/28 and Canon FD 3,5/135
    on accident while bidding on a Canon F1 (old).
    What a nice combination – great optics and less weight and useful for the most
    tasks on holiday or journey.
    I don´t know why but I felt in love with this unobtrusive 3,5/135 lens.
    The rendering or Bokeh is beautiful and it´s half the weight of my beloved
    Nikkor Q 3,5/135 or the Nikkor N 2,0/28 which is three times as heavy
    as the Canon wideangle !

  • Reply
    April 19, 2016 at 10:40 pm

    This is a nice site James. I enjoyed reading our reviews of the 28mm ƒ/2.8 FDn, as well as the 50mm ƒ/1.8 FD. I still own both. The 28mm got a second life since I bought a Sony A6000 and a Sony A7. Once cleaned, both lenses perform admirably.

    Another one that I took from the mot balls is the FD 135mm f2.8. I haven’t used it enough to make a verdict but it seems promising.

    • Reply
      April 19, 2016 at 10:42 pm

      Thanks Jacques! I’m glad you enjoy the site and I’m really glad you reconnected with those gorgeous lenses! Happy shooting!

  • Reply
    May 31, 2016 at 3:26 pm

    Thanks for the great review. I just wanted to verify something if I could. In regards to the adapter, I do need the glass-less adapter to work with something like the Sony A6000? I have a glass-less adapter that lets me use Canon FD lenses on a Canon EOS and with that adapter (again without glass) it makes the lens function as a macro lens. I would like to avoid that problem on my Sony.

    • Reply
      May 31, 2016 at 3:43 pm

      Hey Chad. It’ll work fine on the Sony with a glass less adapter. I use that combination on my Sony a7. The FD to Eos thing has always been tricky on account of flange distance limitations, which we don’t encounter with a mirror less camera. Hope this helps.

      • Reply
        May 31, 2016 at 5:59 pm

        That really does help. Thank you so much for replying. Can’t wait to try some old lenses!

  • Reply
    September 20, 2016 at 9:51 pm

    Thank you for this review, James. It helps me with my decisions…

  • Leave a Reply

    Follow by Email